4.4 Article

Receptor pharmacophore ensemble (REPHARMBLE): a probabilistic pharmacophore modeling approach using multiple protein-ligand complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-018-3820-7

关键词

Ensemble; Structure-based pharmacophore; Probabilistic model; Protein-ligand complex; Virtual screening; Entropy

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India [PDF/2016/000156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ensemble methods are gaining more importance in structure-based approaches as single protein-ligand complexes strongly influence the outcomes of virtual screening. Structure-based pharmacophore modeling based on a single protein-ligand complex with complex feature combinations is often limited to certain chemical classes. The REPHARMBLE (receptor pharmacophore ensemble) approach presented here examines the ability of an ensemble of selected protein-ligand complexes to populate pharmacophore space in the ligand binding site, rigorously assesses the importance of pharmacophore features using Poisson statistic and information theory-based entropy calculations, and generates pharmacophore models with high probabilities. In addition, an ensemble scoring function that combines all the resultant high-scoring pharmacophore models to score molecules is derived. The REPHARMBLE approach was evaluated on ten DUD-E benchmark datasets and afforded good screening performance, as measured by receiver operating characteristic, enrichment factor and Guner-Henry score. Although one of the high-scoring models achieved superior statistical results in each dataset, the ensemble scoring function balanced the shortcomings of each model and passed with close performance measures. This approach offers a reliable way of choosing the best-scoring features to build four-feature pharmacophore queries and customize a target-biased pharmacophore ensemble' scoring function for subsequent virtual screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据