4.4 Article

Structure, aromaticity, stability, and energetic performance of the analogues and derivatives of s-heptazine

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2379-1

关键词

Analogues; Aromaticity; Derivatives; S-heptazine; Stability

资金

  1. Research Fund for Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130755]
  2. Excellent Plan and Zijin Star Research Foundation of National University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

s-heptazine is one of the most attractive polycyclic C-N precursors for graphitic carbon nitride materials (CNx). In this paper in order to find the relationships between the structure, aromaticity, and stability for this novel compound, its analogues with three conjoint six-membered rings (I similar to V) and derivatives with different substituents (VI-1 similar to VI-5) were investigated using the density functional theory method. Aromaticity was predicted using the magnetic criterion iso-chemical shielding surface in the Z direction (ICSSzz) obtained with the gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method. Stability was estimated by the band gap and the topological properties obtained from the atoms in molecules theory. Results show that replacement of the CH groups with the nitrogen atoms in the tricyclic core enhances both the aromaticity and the stability. s-heptazine (VI) that has the maximum number of N atoms among analogues I similar to VI possesses the largest aromaticity and the best stability. Substitutions of -NH2, -NHNH2, and -N-3 groups increase not only the aromaticity but also the stability; -NO2 increases the aromaticity while decreases the stability; -CN decreases both the aromaticity and the stability. Furthermore, the energetic performance of VI-1 similar to VI-5 was evaluated according to the estimated specific impulse (Is). The obtained Is has the order of VI-5>VI-4>VI-3>VI>VI-1>VI-2. The Is of VI-5 is higher than that of HMX (1, 3, 5, 7-tetranitro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetraazacyclooctane).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据