4.7 Article

NLRP3 deficiency accelerates pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling via increased TLR4 expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 96, 期 11, 页码 1189-1202

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-018-1691-0

关键词

NLRP3; Aortic banding; Cardiac remodeling; TLR4

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400178] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20140226, BK20160231] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NLRP3, a member of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family, is involved in cardiac inflammation. However, the functional role of NLRP3 in cardiac remodeling is not clear. To investigate the roles of NLRP3 in pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling, NLRP3 knockout and wild-type mice were subjected to aortic banding to induce cardiac remodeling. The data showed that NLRP3 expression was downregulated in the remodeling process. NLRP3 deficiency accelerated cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and inflammation responses with deteriorating cardiac dysfunction in the pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling mouse model. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were isolated and stimulated with phenylephrine (PE). We identified NLRP3 as a negative regulator of cardiomyocyte remodeling in PE-stimulated cardiomyocyte remodeling using adenovirus-NLRP3 and NLRP3 siRNA. Mechanistically, we found that the expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 was upregulated in NLRP3-deficient mouse hearts and PE-stimulated cardiomyocytes. NLRP3 knockout mice subjected to a TLR4 inhibitor revealed a relieved cardiac remodeling response with improved cardiac dysfunction. Our data suggested that NLRP3 could be a therapeutic target for cardiac remodeling and heart failure.Key messagesNLRP3 expression was downregulated in the remodeling process.NLRP3 deficiency accelerated pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling.NLRP3 acted as a negative regulator of cardiomyocyte remodeling via downregulating TLR4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据