4.7 Article

Defective autophagy impairs ATF3 activity and worsens lung injury during endotoxemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 665-676

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-014-1132-7

关键词

Autophagy; Lung injury; Endotoxemia; Sepsis; Inflammatory response; ATF3 sequestration

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS-PI 10/606, INT 12/007]
  2. Universidad de Oviedo [UNOV 09-pf]
  3. Fundacion Universidad de Oviedo
  4. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer (AECC predoctoral grant)
  5. Fundacion para el fomento en Asturias de la investigacion cientifica aplicada y la tecnologia [FICYT-COF 11-40]
  6. Obra Social-Cajastur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy has emerged as a key regulator of the inflammatory response. To examine the role of autophagy in the development of organ dysfunction during endotoxemia, wild-type and autophagy-deficient (Atg4b-null) mice were challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Animals lacking Atg4b showed increased mortality after endotoxemia. Among the different organs studied, only the lungs showed significant differences between genotypes, with increased damage in mutant animals. Autophagy was activated in lungs from wild-type, LPS-treated mice. Similarly, human bronchial cells show an increased autophagy when exposed to serum from septic patients. We found an increased inflammatory response (increased neutrophilic infiltration, higher levels of Il6, Il12p40, and Cxcl2) in the lungs from knockout mice and identified perinuclear sequestration of the anti-inflammatory transcription factor ATF3 as the putative mechanism responsible for the differences between genotypes. Finally, induction of autophagy by starvation before LPS exposure resulted in a dampened pulmonary response to LPS in wild-type, but not knockout, mice. Similar results were found in human bronchial cells exposed to LPS. Our results demonstrate the central role of autophagy in the regulation of the lung response to endotoxemia and sepsis and its potential modulation by nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据