4.7 Article

Germ-line PHD1 and PHD2 mutations detected in patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma-polycythemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 93-104

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-014-1205-7

关键词

Paraganglioma; Pheochromocytoma; Polycythemia; Erythropoietin

资金

  1. NIH, Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD
  2. NIH, NINDS
  3. NIH, NCI
  4. NIH, NHGRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated genetic/pathogenetic factors associated with a new clinical entity in patients presenting with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PHEO/PGL) and polycythemia. Two patients without hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF2A) mutations, who presented with similar clinical manifestations, were analyzed for other gene mutations, including prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) mutations. We have found for the first time a germ-line mutation in PHD1 in one patient and a novel germ-line PHD2 mutation in a second patient. Both mutants exhibited reduced protein stability with substantial quantitative protein loss and thus compromised catalytic activities. Due to the unique association of patients' polycythemia with borderline or mildly elevated erythropoietin (EPO) levels, we also performed an in vitro sensitivity assay of erythroid progenitors to EPO and for EPO receptor (EPOR) expression. The results show inappropriate hypersensitivity of erythroid progenitors to EPO in these patients, indicating increased EPOR expression/activity. In addition, the present study indicates that HIF dysregulation due to PHD mutations plays an important role in the pathogenesis of these tumors and associated polycythemia. The PHD1 mutation appears to be a new member contributing to the genetic landscape of this novel clinical entity. Our results support the existence of a specific PHD1- and PHD2-associated PHEO/PGL-polycythemia disorder. aEuro cent A novel germ-line PHD1 mutation causing pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and polycythemia. aEuro cent Increased EPOR activity and inappropriate hypersensitivity of erythroid progenitors to EPO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据