4.7 Review

MALAT1- a paradigm for long noncoding RNA function in cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 791-801

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-1028-y

关键词

Cancer; Metastasis; Noncoding RNA; ncRNA; Gene regulation; Gene therapy

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG Transregio TRR77, TP B03]
  2. European Commission
  3. Helmholtz Society [VH-NG-504]
  4. Virtual Helmholtz Institute for Resistance in Leukemia
  5. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
  6. Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) is a bona fide long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). MALAT1, also known as nuclear-enriched transcript 2 (NEAT2), was discovered as a prognostic marker for lung cancer metastasis but also has been linked to several other human tumor entities. Recent work established a critical regulatory function of this lncRNA in lung cancer metastasis and cell migration. Moreover, MALAT1 is an interesting target for antimetastatic therapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Two alternative modes of action have been proposed for MALAT1: regulation of gene expression or alternative splicing. Although the exact mechanism of action in different physiological and pathological conditions still needs to be elucidated, MALAT1 acts as a regulator of gene expression. Although MALAT1 is highly evolutionary conserved in mammals and plays an important role in cancer and metastasis, MALAT1 is not essential for development in a knockout mouse model under normal physiological conditions. Hence, one central question for the future is finding the right stressor and the pathological or environmental condition which requires MALAT1 expression in vivo and entailing its strong evolutionary conservation. Here, we summarize the current knowledge about this important lncRNA. We introduce its discovery, biogenesis, and regulation and describe its known functions, mechanisms of action, and interaction partners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据