4.7 Review

Adenosine signaling during acute and chronic disease states

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 173-181

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-0997-1

关键词

Adenosine receptors; Inflammation; Fibrosis; Vascular barrier function; CD73; ADORA2B; ADORA2A; ADORA3; ADORA1; Acute lung injury; Remodeling; Anti-inflammatory

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [HL070952, DK083559]
  2. American Heart Association [12IRG9150001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine is a signaling nucleoside that is produced following tissue injury, particularly injury involving ischemia and hypoxia. The production of extracellular adenosine and its subsequent signaling through adenosine receptors plays an important role in orchestrating injury responses in multiple organs. There are four adenosine receptors that are widely distributed on immune, epithelial, endothelial, neuronal,and stromal cells throughout the body. Interestingly, these receptors are subject to altered regulation following injury. Studies in mouse models and human cells and tissues have identified that the production of adenosine and its subsequent signaling through its receptors plays largely beneficial roles in acute disease states, with the exception of brain injury. In contrast, if elevated adenosine levels are sustained beyond the acute injury phase, adenosine responses can become detrimental by activating pathways that promote tissue injury and fibrosis. Understanding when during the course of disease adenosine signaling is beneficial as opposed to detrimental and defining the mechanisms involved will be critical for the advancement of adenosine-based therapies for acute and chronic diseases. The purpose of this review is to discuss key observations that define the beneficial and detrimental aspects of adenosine signaling during acute and chronic disease states with an emphasis on cellular processes, such as inflammatory cell regulation, vascular barrier function, and tissue fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据