4.7 Article

Proximal tubule specific knockout of the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3: effects on bicarbonate absorption and ammonium excretion

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 91, 期 8, 页码 951-963

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-1015-3

关键词

Metabolic acidosis; Kidney tubules; Bicarbonate absorption; Salt absorption; Acid loading

资金

  1. Center on Genetics of Transport and Epithelial Biology at the University of Cincinnati
  2. NIH [R56DK 62809]
  3. US Renal Care
  4. DCI
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing NHE3 knockout mouse has significant intestinal electrolyte absorption defects, making this model unsuitable for the examination of the role of proximal tubule NHE3 in pathophysiologic states in vivo. To overcome this problem, we generated proximal convoluted tubule-specific KO mice (NHE3-PT KO) by generating and crossing NHE3 floxed mice with the sodium-glucose transporter 2 Cre transgenic mice. The NHE3-PT KO mice have > 80 % ablation of NHE3 as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy, western blot, and northern analyses, and show mild metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate of 21.2 mEq/l in KO vs. 23.7 mEq/l in WT, p < 0.05). In vitro microperfusion studies in the isolated proximal convoluted tubules demonstrated a similar to 36 % reduction in bicarbonate reabsorption (J (HCO3) = 53.52 +/- 4.61 pmol/min/mm in KO vs. 83.09 +/- 9.73 in WT) and a similar to 27 % reduction in volume reabsorption (J (v) = 0.67 +/- 0.07 nl/min/mm in KO vs. 0.92 +/- 0.06 nl/min/mm in WT) in mutant mice. The NHE3-PT KO mice tolerated NH4Cl acid load well (added to the drinking water) and showed NH4 excretion rates comparable to WT mice at 2 and 5 days after NH4Cl loading without disproportionate metabolic acidosis after 5 days of acid load. Our results suggest that the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 plays an important role in fluid and bicarbonate reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule but does not play an important role in NH4 excretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据