4.7 Review

Danger signals activating innate immunity in graft-versus-host disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 89, 期 9, 页码 833-845

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-011-0767-x

关键词

Graft-versus-host disease; Danger signals; Innate immunity; Adenosine triphosphate; Purinergic receptors; Extracellular matrix; Pathogen-associated molecular patterns; Pattern recognition receptors; Toll-like receptors; NOD-like receptors

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany [ID 7/4-2, ZE 872/1-1]
  2. Heisenberg Fellowship
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe, Germany [ID 108977]
  4. [PE 1450/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive cell death with consecutive release of danger signals can cause immune-mediated tissue destruction. The abundance of cell death is likely to determine the relevance of the danger signals as physiological mechanisms that counteract immune activation may be overruled. Such constellation is conceivable in chemo-/radiotherapy-induced tissue damage, reperfusion injury, trauma, and severe infection. Studies on graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) development have to consider the effects of chemo-/radiotherapy-related tissue damage leading to the release of exogenous and endogenous danger signals. Our previous work has demonstrated a role for adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) as an endogenous danger signal in GvHD. Besides ATP, uric acid or soluble extracellular matrix components are functional danger signals that activate the NLRP3 inflammasome when released from dying cells or from extracellular matrix. In contrast to sterile inflammation, GvHD is more complex since bacterial components that leak through damaged intestinal barriers and the skin can activate pattern recognition receptors and directly contribute to GvHD pathogenesis. These exogenous danger signals transmit immune activation via toll-like receptors and NOD-like receptors of the innate immune system. This review covers both the impact of endogenous and exogenous danger signals activating innate immunity in GvHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据