4.7 Article

Multiple therapeutic effects of valproic acid in spinal muscular atrophy model mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 86, 期 11, 页码 1243-1254

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-008-0388-1

关键词

Animal model; Apoptosis; Motor neuron disease; Neurogenesis; Spinal muscular atrophy; Valproic acid

资金

  1. National Health Research Institute [NHRI-EX92-9029sp]
  2. National Taiwan University Hospital [NTUH-96M04]
  3. Department of Medical Research of National Taiwan University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive disease involving the degeneration of motor neurons with no currently available treatment. While valproic acid (VPA) is a potential treatment for SMA, its therapeutic mechanisms are still controversial. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of action of VPA in the treatment of type III-like SMA mice. SMA and wild-type mice were treated with VPA from 6 to 12 months and 10 to 12 months of age, respectively. Untreated SMA littermates and age-matched wild-type mice were used for comparison. VPA-treated SMA mice showed better motor function, larger motor-evoked potentials, less degeneration of spinal motor neurons, less muscle atrophy, and better neuromuscular junction innervation than non-treated SMA mice. VPA elevated SMN protein levels in the spinal cord through SMN2 promoter activation and probable restoration of correct splicing of SMN2 pre-messenger RNA. VPA also increased levels of anti-apoptotic factors, Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L), in spinal neurons. VPA probably induced neurogenesis and promoted astrocyte proliferation in the spinal cord of type III-like SMA mice, which might contribute to therapeutic effects by enhancing neuroprotection. Through these effects of elevation of SMN protein level, anti-apoptosis, and probable neuroprotection, VPA-treated SMA mice had less degeneration of spinal motor neurons and better motor function than untreated type III-like SMA mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据