4.5 Article

Multi-generational pharmacophore modeling for ligands to the cholane steroid-recognition site in the β1 modulatory subunit of the BKCa channel

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 174-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.10.008

关键词

BKCa channel; Beta subunit; Pharmacophore model

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL103631, R37-AA11560]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large conductance, voltage- and Ca2+-gated K+ (BKCa) channels play a critical role in smooth muscle contractility and thus represent an emerging therapeutic target for drug development to treat vascular disease, gastrointestinal, bladder and uterine disorders. Several compounds are known to target the ubiquitously expressed BKCa channel-forming alpha subunit. In contrast, just a few are known to target the BKCa modulatory beta(1) subunit, which is highly expressed in smooth muscle and scarce in most other tissues. Lack of available high-resolution structural data makes structure-based pharmacophore modeling of beta(1) subunit-dependent BKCa channel activators a major challenge. Following recent discoveries of novel BKCa channel activators that act via beta(1) subunit recognition, we performed ligand-based pharmacophore modeling that led to the successful creation and fine-tuning of a pharmacophore over several generations. Initial models were developed using physiologically active cholane steroids (bile acids) as template. However, as more compounds that act on BKCa beta(1) have been discovered, our model has been refined to improve accuracy. Database searching with our best-performing model has uncovered several novel compounds as candidate BKCa beta 1 subunit ligands. Eight of the identified compounds were experimentally screened and two proved to be activators of recombinant BKCa beta(1) complexes. One of these activators, sobetirome, differs substantially in structure from any previously reported activator. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据