4.7 Review

Enantioselective phytotoxicity and bioacitivity of the enantiomers of the herbicide napropamide

期刊

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 38-44

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.06.004

关键词

Napropamide; Enantiomer; Phytotoxicity; Bioacitivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21337005, 21277171]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1042]
  3. Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project [YEPT0323]
  4. New-Star of Science and Technology [2010B063]
  5. Beijing Metropolis Beijing Nova program [YETP0323]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enantioselectivity of chiral pesticide enantiomers should be taken into consideration in pesticide application and environmental risk assessment. The phytotoxicity of the enantiomers of napropamide to cucumber, soybean, and the bioactivity to the target weeds Poa annua and Festuca arundinacea have been studied in this work. To the nontarget crops, the influences of napropamide on the root, shoot, fresh weight, chlorophyll, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities and membrane lipid peroxides have been studied. (-)-Napropamide was more toxic than the racemate and (+)-napropamide to soybean and cucumber in terms of root, shoot and fresh weight. The content of chlorophyll was not affected by napropamide. The impacts on the activities of SOD, CAT and membrane lipid peroxides showed that napropamide could induce the oxidative stress and rac-napropamide caused a stronger oxidative damage to cucumber and soybean than (-)-napropamide and (+)napropamide. For the target weeds, the influences of napropamide on root, shoot and fresh weight have been studied. (-)-Napropamid was more active to P. annua, while rac-napropamide was more active to F. arundinacea. To reduce environmental pollution and improve the effectiveness of chiral pesticide, single enantiomer should be developed and produced. This work may provide evidence for developing optical pure product. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据