4.5 Article

3D-QSAR studies of azaoxoisoaporphine, oxoaporphine, and oxoisoaporphine derivatives as anti-AChE and anti-AD agents by the CoMFA method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.02.003

关键词

Azaoxoisoaporphine derivatives; Alzheimer's disease; AChE inhibitors; A beta aggregation; 3D-QASR; CoMFA

资金

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110171110051]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21172272, 21103234]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [11ykzd05]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2011030003190]
  5. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA34630]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, a series of novel azaoxoisoaporphine derivatives were reported and their inhibitory activities toward acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), and A beta aggregation were evaluated. The new compounds remained high inhibitory potency on A beta aggregation, with inhibitory activity from 29.42% to 89.63% at a concentration of 10 mu M, but had no action on AChE or BuChE, which was very different from our previously reported oxoaporphine and oxoisoaporphine derivatives. By 3D-QSAR studies, we constructed a reliable CoMFA model (q(2) = 0.856 and r(2) = 0.986) based on the inhibitory activities toward AChE and discovered key information on structure and anti-AChE activities among the azaoxoisoaporphine, oxoaporphine, and oxoisoaporphine derivatives. The model was further confirmed by the test-set validation (q(2) = 0.873, r(2) = 0.937, and slope k = 0.902) and Y-randomization examination. The statistically significant and physically meaningful 3D-QSAR/CoMFA model provided better insight into understanding the inhibitory behaviors of those chemicals, which may provide useful information for the rational molecular design of azaoxoisoaporphine derivatives anti-AChE and anti-AD agents. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据