4.5 Article

Evaluation of various inverse docking schemes in multiple targets identification

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 326-330

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.09.004

关键词

Inverse docking; Target identification; Target database; GOLD; FlexX; TarFisDock; TarSearch-X; TarSearch-M

资金

  1. Agilent Foundation [0557]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [20702009]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2009AA02Z308]
  4. National Drug Innovative Program [2009ZX09301-011]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lack of accurate and efficient methods for target identification has been the bottleneck in drug discovery. In recent years, inverse docking has been applied as an efficient method in target identification, and several specific inverse docking strategies have been employed in academic and industrial researches. However, the effectiveness of these docking strategies in multiple targets identification is unclear. In this study, five inverse docking schemes were evaluated to find out the most effective approach in multiple targets identification. A target database containing a highly qualified dataset that is composed of 1714 entries from 1594 known drug targets covering 18 biochemical functions was collected as a testing pool for inverse docking. The inverse docking engines including GOLD. FlexX,Tarfisdock and two in-house target search schemes TarSearch-X and TarSearch-M were evaluated by eight multiple target systems in the dataset. The results show that TarSearch-X is the most effective method in multiple targets identification and validation among these five schemes, and the effectiveness of GOLD in multiple targets identification is also acceptable. Moreover, these two inverse docking strategies will also be helpful in predicting the undesirable effects of drugs, such as toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据