4.3 Article

The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Coix lacryma-jobi and a Comparative Molecular Evolutionary Analysis of Plastomes in Cereals

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 311-318

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-009-9275-9

关键词

Coix lacryma-jobi; Joinvillea plicata; Graminoid Poales; Plastome; Chloroplast genome; Indel; Inversion

资金

  1. Plant Molecular Biology Center
  2. Northern Illinois University Foundation
  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graminoid molecular evolution was investigated by chloroplast genome (plastome) scale analyses. A complete plastome from Coix lacryma-jobi (Poaceae) and a draft plastome from Joinvillea plicata (Joinvilleaceae) were sequenced and analyzed. The draft plastome included conserved protein-coding loci routinely analyzed in previous studies plus one additional locus of demonstrated phylogenetic utility. The methodological approach was to directly sequence overlapping amplicons from known plastome regions. Over 100 pairs of amplification and sequencing primers were designed and positioned to flank overlapping 1,200-base pair fragments around the entire plastome. Newly determined sequences were analyzed with published plastomes from representatives of Panicoideae, Ehrhartoideae, and Pooideae. Considerable variation was found for studies within the family and even within Andropogoneae. Readily interpreted mutation patterns were observed, such as small inversions in hairpin-loop regions and indels, which were common in intergenic spacers. Maximum or near-maximum bootstrap support was observed in all analyses resolving relationships between subfamilies. However, the addition of characters from noncoding regions increased the number of parsimony-informative characters and lengthened short internal branches (Andropogoneae), better defining intergeneric relationships. Thus, characters in complete plastomes can be used over a wide scope of phylogenetic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据