4.3 Article

Evolution of Phage-Type RNA Polymerases in Higher Plants: Characterization of the Single Phage-Type RNA Polymerase Gene from Selaginella moellendorffii

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 528-538

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-009-9229-2

关键词

Selaginella moellendorfii; Phage-type RNA polymerase; Subcellular localization; Gene duplication; Phylogenetic analysis; Molecular evolution

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [WE 1595/6-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selaginella moellendorfii (spikemoss) sequence trace data encoding a polypeptide highly similar to angiosperm and moss phage-type organelle RNA polymerases (RpoTs) were used to isolate a BAC clone containing the full-length gene SmRpoT as well as the corresponding cDNA. The SmRpoT mRNA comprises 3452 nt with an open reading frame of 3006 nt, encoding a putative protein of 1002 amino acids with a molecular mass of 113 kDa. The SmRpoT gene comprises 19 exons and 18 introns, conserved in their position with those of the angiosperm and Physcomitrella RpoT genes. In phylogenetic analyses, the Selaginella RpoT polymerase is in a sister position to all other phage-type polymerases of angiosperms. However, according to its conserved exon-intron structure, the Selaginella RpoT gene is representative of the molecular evolutionary lineage giving rise to the RpoT gene family of flowering plants. The N-terminal transit peptide of SmRpoT is shown to confer targeting of green fluorescent protein exclusively to mitochondria after transient expression in Arabidopsis and Selaginella protoplasts. Angiosperms and the moss P. patens possess small gene families encoding RpoTs, which include mitochondrial- and chloroplast-targeted RNA polymerases. In striking contrast, the Selaginella RpoT gene is shown to be single-copy, although Selaginella, as a lycophyte, has a phylogenetic position between Physcomitrella and angiosperms. Thus, there is no evidence that Selaginella may contain a nuclear-encoded phage-type chloroplast RNA polymerase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据