4.3 Article

Age- and cell-related gene expression of aromatase and estrogen receptors in the rat testis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 147-159

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/JME-10-0041

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. CAPES/COFECUB [Sv:554/07]
  3. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spermatogenesis is a complex and coordinated process leading to the formation of spermatozoa. This event, which is under the control of numerous endocrine and paracrine factors, seems to also be controlled by estrogens which exert their effects via nuclear estrogen receptors (ESRs) ESR1 and ESR2. Estrogens are synthesized by aromatase which is biologically expressed in the rat testis. The objective of our study was to clarify the gene expression patterns of aromatase and ESRs according to age and in the two compartments of the adult rat testis. In the adult, transcripts of aromatase vary according to the germ cell type and to the stages of seminiferous epithelium, a maximum being observed at stage I. The ESR1 gene is highly expressed in the adult testis and in stages from VIIc-d to XIV. Moreover, both ESR mRNA levels are higher in purified round spermatids than in pachytene spermatocytes, suggesting a putative role of estrogens in the haploid steps of spermatogenesis. The variability of the results in the expression of both ESRs led us to explore the putative presence of variants in the rat testis. Concerning ESR1, we have shown the presence of the full-length form and of one isoform with exon 4 deleted. For ESR2, besides the wild type, three isoforms were observed: one with exon 3 deleted, another with an insertion of 54 nucleotides, and the last one with both modifications. Therefore, the stage-regulated expression of aromatase and ESR1 genes in the rat testis suggests a likely role of estrogens in spermatogenesis. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2010) 45, 147-159

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据