4.3 Article

Differential regulation of human dopamine D-2 and somatostatin receptor subtype expression by glucocorticoids in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1-2, 页码 47-56

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/JME-08-0110

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopamine agonists (DA) and somatostatin (SS) analogues have been proposed in the treatment of ACTH-producing neuroendocrine tumours that cause Cushing's syndrome. Inversely, glucocorticoids (GCs) can differentially influence DA receptor D-2 or SS receptor subtype (sst) expression in rodent models. If this also occurs in human neuro-endocrine cells, then cortisol-lowering therapy could directly affect the expression of these target receptors. In this study, we investigated the effects of the GC dexamethasone (DEX) on D-2 and sst expression in three human neuro-endocrine cell lines: BON (carcinoid) and 17 (medullary thyroid carcinoma) versus DMS (small cell lung cancer), which is severely GC resistant. In BON and TT, sst(2) mRNA was strongly down-regulated in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 0.84 nM and 0.16 nM), whereas sst(5) and especially D-2 were much more resistant to DEX treatment. Sst(2) down-regulation was abrogated by a GC receptor antagonist and reversible in time upon GC withdrawal, At the protein level, DEX also induced a decrease in the total number of SS (-52%) and sst(2)-specific(-42%) binding sites. Pretreatment with DEX abrogated calcitonin inhibition by sst(2)-preferring analogue octreotide in TT. In DMS, DEX did not cause significant changes in the expression of these receptor subtypes. In conclusion, we show that GCs selectively down-regulate sst(2), but not D-2 and only to a minor degree sst(5) inhuman neuro-endocrine BON and TT cells. This mechanism may also be responsible for the low expression of sst(2) in corticotroph adenomas and underwrite the current interest in sst(5) and D-2 as possible therapeutic targets for a medical treatment of Cushing's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据