4.4 Article

Targeted, High-Depth, Next-Generation Sequencing of Cancer Genes in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded and Fine-Needle Aspiration Tumor Specimens

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 234-247

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.11.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention Institute of Texas [CP120017]
  2. Asuragen, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Implementation of highly sophisticated technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), into routine clinical practice requires compatibility with common tumor biopsy types, such as formal-in-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and fine-needle aspiration specimens, and validation metrics for platforms, controls, and data analysis pipelines. In this study, a two-step PCR enrichment workflow was used to assess 540 known cancer-relevant variants in 16 oncogenes for high-depth sequencing in tumor samples on either mature (Illumina GAIIx) or emerging (Ion Torrent PGM) NGS platforms. The results revealed that the background noise of variant detection was elevated approximately twofold in FFPE compared with cell Line DNA. Bioinformatic algorithms were optimized to accommodate this background. Variant calls from 38 residual clinical colorectal cancer FFPE specimens and 10 thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens were compared across multiple cancer genes, resulting in an accuracy of 96.1% (95% CI, 96.1% to 99.3%) compared with Sanger sequencing, and 99.6% (95% CI, 97.9% to 99.9%) compared with an alternative method with an analytical sensitivity of 1% mutation detection. A total of 45 of 48 samples were concordant between NGS platforms across all matched regions, with the three discordant calls each represented at <10% of reads. Consequently, NGS of targeted oncogenes in real-life tumor specimens using distinct platforms addresses unmet needs for unbiased and highly sensitive mutation detection and can accelerate both basic and clinical cancer research. (3 Mol Diagn 2013, 15: 234-247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.11.006)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据