4.0 Article

Enzymatic transformation of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) by immobilized α-cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from recombinant Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
卷 68, 期 3-4, 页码 223-229

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.11.009

关键词

L-Ascorbic acid; alpha-Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase; 2-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid; Immobilization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20836003]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [20625619]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP30901]
  4. 973 Project [2007CB714306, 2010CB535014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aims to produce 2-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) from ascorbic acid and beta-cyclodextrin with immobilized alpha-cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (alpha-CGTase) from recombinant Escherichia coli. Molecular sieve (SBA-15) was used as an adsorbent, and sodium alginate was used as a carrier, and glutaraldehyde (GA) was used as a cross-linker. The effects of several key variables on alpha-CGTase immobilization were examined, and optimal immobilization conditions were determined as the following: glutaraldehyde (GA, cross-linker) 0.01% (v/v), SBA-15 (adsorbent) 2 g/L, CaCl2 3g/L. sodium alginate 20 g/L, adsorption time 3 h, and immobilization time 1 h. In comparison with free alpha-CGTase, immobilized alpha-CGTase had a similar optimal pH (5.5) and a higher optimal temperature (45 degrees C). The continuous production of AA-2G from ascorbic acid and beta-cyclodextrin in the presence of immobilized alpha-CGTase was carried out, and the highest AA-2G production reached 21 g/L, which was 2-fold of that with free alpha-CGTase. The immobilization procedure developed here was efficient for alpha-CGTase immobilization, which was proved to be a prospective approach for the enzymatic production of AA-2G. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据