4.0 Article

A molecular modelling study to rationalize the regioselectivity in acylation of flavonoid glycosides catalyzed by Candida antarctica lipase B

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
卷 59, 期 1-3, 页码 96-105

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.01.011

关键词

Candida antarctica lipase B; Docking; Flavonoid acylation; Molecular modelling; Regioselectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regioselective behaviour of the Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) towards two flavonoid glycosides, rutin and isoquercitrin, in the acetylation reaction was investigated through molecular modelling. A protocol constituted by a Monte Carlo-based docking procedure and classical force fields calculations was applied to find probable binding modes of the substrates inside the catalytic cavity and optimize the corresponding complexes. The analysis of these complexes allowed identifying productive ones (that means, those able to lead to the formation of the ester product) according to three parameters: (1) protein distortion: (2) stability of hydrogen bond interactions with the oxyanion hole residues; (3) localization of hydroxyl groups with regard to the region comprised between the catalytic histidine and serine residues. Results showed that the aglycon part of both rutin and isoquercitrin was localized at the entrance of the binding pocket, stabilized by hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions. The sugar part of the flavonoids was placed close to the pocket bottom. In particular, only theprimary6 ''-OH of the isoquercitrin glucose and the secondary 4'''-OH of the rutin rhamnose were expected to be acetylated, as they were the only ones to stabilize simultaneously near to the catalytic histidine and the acetate bound to the catalytic serine. These findings are in accordance with experimental data and give a suitable explanation, at an atomic level, of the regioselectivity of CALB in the flavonoid glycosides acetylation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据