4.0 Article

Kinetic modelling of naringin hydrolysis using a bitter sweet alfa-rhamnopyranosidase immobilized in k-carrageenan

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
卷 51, 期 1-2, 页码 10-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.09.023

关键词

naringin; hydrolysis; RSM; naringinase; k-carrageenan; grapefruit juice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naringin. the principal bitter flavonone glycoside and the primary bitter component in grapefruit juice, can be hydrolysed by naringinase (with expressed activity in alfa-L-rhamnosidase and beta-D-glucosidase) into rhamnose and prunin (one-third bitterness ratio to naringin), which can be further hydrolysed into glucose and tasteless naringenin. The main goal of this work was the modelling and optimisation of the enzymatic activity of naringinase entrapped in k-carrageenan beads, in grapefruit juice. In order to attain these goals naringinase activity, naringin conversion and naringenin formation were evaluated. In this study response surface methodology was used for modelling the naringin hydrolysis by naringinase immobilized in k-carrageenan beads as a function of temperature (9-51 degrees C) and naringinase concentration (0.29-1.7 g L-1) in grapefruit juice. Experiments were carried out following a central composite rotatable design. Naringinase activity could be described by response surfaces that enabled to fit second-order polynomials to experimental data points. The high values of R-2 (0.996) and R-adj(2) (0.992) of the models show a close agreement between the experimental results and the theoretical values predicted by the models. The higher naringin conversion (95%) was attained with naringinase concentrations higher than 800 mg L-1 and temperatures higher than 30 degrees C. This is a promising result for a future application of enzymatic hydrolysis of naringin immobilized in k-carrageenan, in grapefruit juice industry, maintaining juice properties. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据