4.2 Article

One-pot synthesis of Ag/AgCl@SiO2 core-shell plasmonic photocatalyst in natural geothermal water for efficient photocatalysis under visible light

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 30-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.05.041

关键词

Ag/AgCl; SiO2; Plasmonic; Photocatalysis; Geothermal water

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272107]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK2011024]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, China [20133219110015]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag/AgCl@SiO2 core-shell plasmonic photocatalyst was directly synthesized by a one-pot green method at room temperature using silver nitrate (AgNO3) as silver source and geothermal water as chlorine and silica source, wherein no surfactants, polymers, reducing agents or other additives were required. It is demonstrated that SiO2 coated Ag/AgCl products can be formed uniformly by simply adding an aqueous solution of AgNO3 into the natural geothermal water. The as-synthesized Ag/AgCl@SiO2 samples exhibit excellent photocatalytic performance and stability for the degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation, owing to the strong localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of the photoexcited metallic Ag species. The trapping experiments confirmed that holes (h(+)) were the main active species in the photocatalytic process. The silica shell on the surface of Ag/AgCl can protect Ag nanoparticles from deterioration and increase the stability of Ag/AgCl plasmonic photocatalyst. Direct synthesis of Ag/AgCl@SiO2 photocatalysts in this work might open up new insights into the application of cheap geothermal water resources and provide new opportunities for facile fabrication of visible-light-driven Ag/AgCl-based plasmonic photocatalyst. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据