4.2 Article

Tuning selectivity and stability in propane dehydrogenation by shaping Pt particles: A combined experimental and DFT study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 329-336

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.08.008

关键词

Shaped metal particle; DFT; Pt; Propane dehydrogenation

资金

  1. 973 Project of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB720500]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21003046, 21403066, 21473053]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [WA1313006]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shaped metal particles are known to possess distinct catalytic properties, which is often attributed to the catalytic activities of different particle facets. In this contribution, propane dehydrogenation on Pt particles of different shapes is investigated by a combination of experiments and DFT calculations. The selectivity toward propylene and catalyst stability in propane dehydrogenation can be enhanced by shaping Pt nanoparticles under industrially relevant conditions. Octahedral particles (12.0 nm) dominated by the Pt(1 1 1) surface have higher selectivity toward propylene production and better stability than cubic particles (11.5 nm) that are dominated by the Pt(1 0 0) surface. Combined experiments and DFT calculations suggest that the weakened binding strength of propylene and increased energy barrier for the C-H bond cleavage in propylene dehydrogenation on Pt(1 1 1) compared to Pt(1 0 0) and Pt(2 1 1) contribute to the higher selectivity toward propylene by lowering the formation possibility of the deeply dehydrogenated intermediates. When coke is formed on the Pt surface, the d-band of surrounding Pt atoms is shifted farther below the Fermi level, leading to the deactivation of Pt catalyst. Our DFT calculations provide a rational interpretation of the experimental observations regarding the shape effects on propane dehydrogenation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据