4.2 Article

Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles supported on surface-modified poly(N-vinylimidazale) as catalysts for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 128-135

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2012.08.021

关键词

Poly(styrene) poly(N-vinylimidazole); Silver nanoparticles; Heterogeneous nanoparticle catalyst; Immobilization; 4-Nitrophenol reduction

资金

  1. Council of Scientific Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of bead-shaped stable heterogeneous nanoparticle catalysts, viz, polymer-supported poly(styrene) functionalized with poly(vinylimidazole) immobilized silver nanoparticles (PS-PVIm-AgNPs) were prepared from poly(styrene)-co-poly(N-vinylimidazole) polymer matrices derived from 2% (Type-I) and 10% (Type-II) cross-linking monomer divinylbenzene and AgNO3 as a metal precursor. The appearance of surface plasmon resonance peak at 422 nm in UV and Ag-N-(str,N-ring) peaks noticed at 1664 cm(-1) for Type-I and 1668 cm(-1) for Type-II catalysts in FT-IR confirms the immobilization of AgNPs onto PS-PVIm. The SEM and EDAX results prove that the Type-I catalyst has heterogeneous morphology with more white patches and enhanced amount of surface nitrogen and AgNPs than Type-II. The size of the AgNPs on Type-I and Type-II catalysts was measured as 10 nm and 14.6 nm from XRD, respectively. The comparative catalytic study for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol reveals that the pseudo-first order rate constant (k(obs)) for Type-I catalyst was relatively superior (k(obs) = 5.12 x 10(-4)) than Type-II (k(obs)=1.20 x 10(-4)) due to the addition of high cross-linking load in Type-II. For the same reaction with Type-I catalyst, the variation of [substrate], [catalyst] and [NaBH4] was directly proportional to k(obs). The stability and reusability of the catalyst were observed good and sustained even at six cycles. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据