4.2 Article

Catalytic activity of bifunctional transition metal oxide containing phosphated alumina catalysts in the dehydration of glycerol

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 342-43, 期 -, 页码 91-100

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.04.020

关键词

Transition metal oxide; Al2O3-PO4; Glycerol; Dehydration

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different transition metal oxide loaded on phosphated alumina as catalysts for the gas-phase dehydration of glycerol. The series of MeO-Al2O3-PO4 catalysts at the constant Me:Al ratio was prepared by impregnation of alumina and characterized with respect to their textural properties, crystallinity, acidity and reducibility. Catalytic performance was tested at the constant operating conditions in the presence of steam. It was found that conversion, and acrolein formation increased with the increase of the total catalyst acidity: i.e., the selectivity to acrolein increased in the order: Ce < Mn < Cr < V similar to Fe < Cu < Mo < W. The highest selectivity towards acrolein (54%) was observed over W contained catalyst after a long-term test, i.e., 30 h. For Ce, Fe and Cr catalysts low selectivity to acrolein (12-23%) was observed. Contrary CuOx-Al2O3-PO4 catalyst favored the formation of acetol (50%). In the case of Cr-, Mn- and V-containing alumina phosphates an enhanced formation of acetaldehyde and COx was observed as a result of destructive glycerol cleavage. The V- and Fe-containing catalysts promote the formation of allyl alcohol. Finally, the change of the total acidity, oxidation state and crystallinity for spent catalysts was studied by NH3-TPD, TPO, TPR and XPS analysis. In general, MO-Al2O3-PO4 catalysts showed improved stability against deactivation which can be attributed to the oxidative properties of the transition metal oxide components that enhance coke removal. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据