4.2 Article

Influence of supports structure on the activity and adsorption behavior of copper-based catalysts for NO reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 327, 期 1-2, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.05.002

关键词

Interaction; Copper species; Supports; Surface structure; Nitrates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20873060, 20973091]
  2. Jiangsu innovation talent [BK2008001]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Graduate of Jiangsu Province [CX09B-003Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of supports (gamma-Al2O3, t-ZrO2, CeO2 and Ce0.67Zr0.33O2) on the activity and adsorption behavior of copper-based catalysts was comparatively studied by BET, XRD, Raman, HRTEM, H-2-TPR, in situ FT-IR and NO + CO model reaction. It was suggested that the incorporated copper species on ceria (1 1 1) surface were in an unstable five-coordination structure, and on t-ZrO2 were in the elongated environment, whereas on gamma-Al2O3 were in a symmetrical and stable octahedral coordination. These dissimilarities naturally influenced the synergistic interaction between copper and supports, thus CuO/CeO2 catalyst showed the higher reducibility and TOF for NO reduction. In situ FT-IR of NO adsorption/desorption results revealed that compared with those adsorbed species on CuO/t-ZrO2 and CuO/gamma-Al2O3, the chelating nitro, bidentate and monodentate nitrates over the ceria-rich phase catalysts were more active to desorb or transform, and hyponitrites were also identified on its surface above 100 degrees C due to the formation of oxygen vacancy. Co-interaction of NO + CO results suggested that the adsorption type and reactivity of NOx species were dependent on the supports structure and temperature. The chelating nitro, bidentate and bridge nitrates over CuO/CeO2 surface were more active intermediates to react with CO at low temperatures due to its superior redox activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据