4.2 Article

The dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene with CO2 over V2O5/CexZr1-xO2 prepared with different methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 329, 期 1-2, 页码 64-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.06.019

关键词

Ethylbenzene dehydrogenation; CO2; CexZr1-xO2 solid solution; Vanadia

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0799]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-surface-area CexZr1-xO2 composite oxides with various compositions were prepared with modified hydrothermal and sol-gel methods, respectively. Different amounts of vanadia were loaded via an incipient wetness technique for the preparation of the V2O5/CexZr1-xO2. The prepared samples were subjected to the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene (EB) in the presence of CO2 in a fixed-bed reactor under the conditions of T = 823 K, P = 1 atm, and CO2/BE molar ratio = 20. The hydrothermal CexZr1-xO2 loaded with 6 wt.% V2O5 showed obviously higher EB conversion than the 6 wt.% V2O5/CexZr1-xO2 (sol-gel) although similar styrene selectivity was obtained. Moreover, the V2O5 loadings and the Ce/Zr ratios had clear influence on both the activity and the stability of the catalyst. Irrespective of the preparation methods and Ce/Zr ratios, XRD results indicate that nanocrystalline CexZr1-xO2 solid solution was exclusively formed. Independent of the Ce/Zr ratios, the CexZr1-xO2 prepared with hydrothermal method was composed of pure cubic phase while mixed phases were observed for the sol-gel samples as revealed from Raman results. With increasing vanadia loadings from 3 to 15 wt.%, different forms of vanadium species, such as vanadates and crystalline V2O5, were observed from Raman spectra. Irrespective of the V2O5 loadings, a single-step reduction of the supported V2O5 was revealed from the TPR patterns. Based on these and the TGA/DSC analysis of the used catalysts, the experimental results were extensively discussed and tentatively explained. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据