4.2 Article

Cr-free Fe-based water-gas shift catalysts prepared through propylene oxide-assisted sol gel technique

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 321, 期 1-2, 页码 61-70

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.02.002

关键词

Propylene oxide; Citric acid; Fe-Al-Cu; WGS; Maghemite; Formate; TPO; Copper; Sol-gel; Magnetite; XPS; DRIFTS

资金

  1. Ohio Coal Development Office
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-05GO15033]
  3. NSF [0114098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromium-free Fe-based water-gas shift catalysts were prepared through a gelation agent-assisted sol-gel route utilizing propylene oxide and citric acid as the gelation agents. Catalyst preparation using propylene oxide is a one-pot method that is cleaner, more eco-friendly and less time consuming over our previously developed sol-gel method for preparing Fe-Al-Cu and leads to comparable activities. The effect of Cu loading on the performance of Fe-Al-Cu catalyst was investigated using a syngas mixture as feed. The optimized Fe-Al-Cu formulation demonstrated stable WGS performance over a wide temperature range (250-400 degrees C). X-ray diffraction patterns revealed the role of promoters in the formation of maghemite phase and in controlling the crystallite size. The incorporation of copper in iron oxide matrix resulted in formation of maghemite phase over hematite, thereby causing a significant improvement in WGS performance. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) study of CO adsorption indicated the formation of formate species on the surface. The apparent activation energies for re-oxidation of the Fe-Al-Cu catalysts were found to depend on the copper content. Over the best performing Fe-Al-Cu catalyst, surface re-oxidation by water during WGS reaction proceeds at a much higher rate than surface reduction via CO oxidation, whereas for other catalysts of the series, surface re-oxidation was shown to be the rate determining step. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据