4.7 Article

Functional Evolution of Ribonuclease Inhibitor: Insights from Birds and Reptiles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 426, 期 17, 页码 3041-3056

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.06.007

关键词

leucine-rich repeat (LRR); protein-protein interaction; reactive oxygen species (ROS); redox homeostasis; ribonuclease

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01 GM098248]
  4. NIH [R01 CA073808, U54 GM074901, P50 GM064598]
  5. US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science [W-31-109-ENG-38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribonuclease inhibitor (RI) is a conserved protein of the mammalian cytosol. RI binds with high affinity to diverse secretory ribonucleases (RNases) and inhibits their enzymatic activity. Although secretory RNases are found in all vertebrates, the existence of a non-mammalian RI has been uncertain. Here, we report on the identification and characterization of RI homologs from chicken and anole lizard. These proteins bind to RNases from multiple species but exhibit much greater affinity for their cognate RNases than for mammalian RNases. To reveal the basis for this differential affinity, we determined the crystal structure of mouse, bovine, and chicken RI center dot RNase complexes to a resolution of 2.20, 2.21, and 1.92 angstrom, respectively. A combination of structural, computational, and bioinformatic analyses enabled the identification of two residues that appear to contribute to the differential affinity for RNases. We also found marked differences in oxidative instability between mammalian and non-mammalian RIs, indicating evolution toward greater oxygen sensitivity in Rls from mammalian species. Taken together, our results illuminate the structural and functional evolution of RI, along with its dynamic role in vertebrate biology. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据