4.7 Article

Effect of Metal Loading and Subcellular pH on Net Charge of Superoxide Dismutase-1

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 425, 期 22, 页码 4388-4404

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.018

关键词

metal ions; amyloid; copper; zinc; protein misfolding

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0790]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The net charge of a folded protein is hypothesized to influence myriad biochemical processes (e.g., protein misfolding, electron transfer, molecular recognition); however, few tools exist for measuring net charge and this elusive property remains undetermined-t any pH-or nearly all proteins. This study used lysine-acetyl protein charge ladders and capillary electrophoresis to measure the net charge of superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1)-whose aggregation causes amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-as a function of coordinated metal ions and pH. The net negative charge of apo-SOD1 was similar to predicted values; however, the binding of a single Zn2+ or Cu2+ ion reduced the net negative charge by a greater magnitude than predicted (i.e., similar to 4 units, instead of 2), whereas the SOD1 protein underwent charge regulation upon binding 2-4 metal ions. From pH5 to pH8 (i.e., a range consistent with the multiple subcellular loci of SOD1), the holo-SOD1 protein underwent smaller fluctuations in net negative charge than predicted (i.e., similar to 3 units, instead of similar to 14) and did not undergo charge inversion at its isoelectric point (pI = 5.3) but remained anionic. The regulation of SOD1 net charge along its pathways of metal binding, and across solvent pH, provides insight into its metal-induced maturation and enzymatic activity (which remains diffusion-limited across pH5-8). The anionic nature of holo-SOD1 across subcellular pH suggests that similar to 45 different ALS-linked mutations to SOD1 will reduce its net negative charge regardless of subcellular localization. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据