4.7 Article

Deep Sequencing of Systematic Combinatorial Libraries Reveals β-Lactamase Sequence Constraints at High Resolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 424, 期 3-4, 页码 150-167

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.09.014

关键词

enzyme; mutagenesis; ultrahigh-throughput sequencing; sequence alignments; protein stability

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI32956]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, combinatorial libraries were used in conjunction with ultrahigh-throughput sequencing to comprehensively determine the impact of each of the 19 possible amino acid substitutions at each residue position in the TEM-1 beta-lactamase enzyme. The libraries were introduced into Escherichia coli, and mutants were selected for ampicillin resistance. The selected colonies were pooled and subjected to ultrahigh-throughput sequencing to reveal the sequence preferences at each position. The depth of sequencing provided a clear, statistically significant picture of what amino acids are favored for ampicillin hydrolysis for all 263 positions of the enzyme in one experiment. Although the enzyme is generally tolerant of amino acid substitutions, several surface positions far from the active site are sensitive to substitutions suggesting a role for these residues in enzyme stability, solubility, or catalysis. In addition, information on the frequency of substitutions was used to identify mutations that increase enzyme thermodynamic stability. Finally, a comparison of sequence requirements based on the mutagenesis results versus those inferred from sequence conservation in an alignment of 156 class A beta-lactamases reveals significant differences in that several residues in TEM-1 do not tolerate substitutions and yet extensive variation is observed in the alignment and vice versa. An analysis of the TEM-1 and other class A structures suggests that residues that vary in the alignment may nevertheless make unique, but important, interactions within individual enzymes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据