4.7 Article

Structural Comparison of Mouse and Human α-Synuclein Amyloid Fibrils by Solid-State NMR

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 420, 期 1-2, 页码 99-111

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.04.009

关键词

Parkinson's disease; magic-angle spinning; sequential assignment strategy; secondary structure; supramolecular arrangement

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Marie Curie IIF Fellowship within the Seventh European Community Framework Programme
  5. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibrilar et-synuclein (AS) is the major component of Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson's disease. Mouse AS (mAS) aggregates much faster than human AS (hAS), although mAS differs from hAS at only seven positions in its primary sequence. Currently, little is known about the site-specific structural differences between mAS and hAS fibrils. Here, we applied state-of-the-art solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) methods to structurally characterize mAS fibrils. The assignment strategy employed a set of high-resolution 2D and 3D ssNMR spectra recorded on uniformly [C-13, N-15], [1-C-13]glucose, and [2-C-13]glucose labeled mAS fibrils. An almost complete resonance assignment (96% of backbone amide N-15 and 93% of all C-13 nuclei) was obtained for residues from Gly41 to Val95, which form the core of mAS fibrils. Six beta-strands were identified to be within the fibril core of mAS based on a secondary chemical shift and NHHC analysis. Intermolecular C-13:N-15 labeled restraints obtained from mixed 1:1 C-13/N-15-labeled mAS fibrils reveal a parallel, in-register supramolecular beta-sheet arrangement. The results were compared in detail to recent structural studies on hAS fibrils and indicate the presence of a structurally conserved motif comprising residues Glu61-Lys80. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据