4.7 Article

Mass Spectrometry-From Peripheral Proteins to Membrane Motors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 423, 期 1, 页码 1-13

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.033

关键词

membrane protein complexes; mass spectrometry; detergent micelles

资金

  1. European Union Council's Seventh Framework PROSPECTS (a European Research Council advanced grant)
  2. Royal Society Professorship
  3. Wellcome Trust Programme
  4. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [1100515, 1120169]
  5. Millennium Nucleus [P10-035-F]
  6. Medical Research Council [G1000819] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G1000819] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

That membrane protein complexes could survive in the gas phase had always seemed impossible. The lack of chargeable residues, high hydrophobicity, and poor solubility and the vast excess of detergent contributed to the view that it would not be possible to obtain mass spectra of intact membrane complexes. With the recent success in recording mass spectra of these complexes, first from recombinant sources and later from the cellular environment, many surprising properties of these gas phase membrane complexes have been revealed. The first of these was that the interactions between membrane and soluble subunits could survive in vacuum, without detergent molecules adhering to the complex. The second unexpected feature was that their hydrophobicity and, consequently, lower charge state did not preclude ionization. The final surprising finding was that these gas phase membrane complexes carry with them lipids, bound specifically in subunit interfaces. This provides us with an opportunity to distinguish annular lipids that surround the membrane complexes, from structural lipids that have a role in maintaining structure and subunit interactions. In this perspective, we track these developments and suggest explanations for the various discoveries made during this research. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据