4.7 Article

Structural Analysis of the Quaking Homodimerization Interface

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 423, 期 5, 页码 766-781

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.027

关键词

STAR/GSG proteins; Qual domain; crystal structure; RNA binding; C2C12 myoblasts

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. National Center for Research Resources
  4. Biomedical Technology Program
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  6. National Institutes of Health [GM053320, 5T32GM008646-14]
  7. Deutsche Forschurtgsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quaking (QkI) is a prototypical member of the STAR (signal transducer and activator of RNA) protein family, which plays key roles in posttranscriptional gene regulation by controlling inRNA translation, stability and splicing. QkI-5 has been shown to regulate mRNA expression in the central nervous system, but little is known about its roles in other tissues. STAR proteins function as dimers and bind to bipartite RNA sequences; however, the structural and functional roles of homodimerization and heterodimerization are still unclear. Here, we present the crystal structure of the QkI dimerization domain, which adopts a similar stacked helix-turn-helix arrangement as its homologs GLD-1 (germ line development defective-1) and Sam68 (Src-associated protein during mitosis, 68 kDa) but differs by an additional helix inserted in the dimer interface. Variability of the dimer interface residues likely ensures selective homodimerization by preventing association with non-cognate STAR family proteins in the cell. Mutations that inhibit dimerization also significantly impair RNA binding in vitro, alter QkI-5 protein levels and impair QkI function in a splicing assay in vivo. Together, our results indicate that a functional Qua1 homodimerization domain is required for QkI-5 function in mammalian cells. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据