4.7 Article

Crystal Structure of Serratia fonticola Sfh-I: Activation of the Nucleophile in Mono-Zinc Metallo-β-Lactamases

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 411, 期 5, 页码 951-959

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.043

关键词

metallo-beta-lactamase; antibiotic resistance; zinc beta-lactamase; X-ray crystallography; catalytic mechanism

资金

  1. Center for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal [BD/30490/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallo-p,-lactamases (MBLs) or class B beta-lactamases are zinc-dependent enzymes capable of inactivating almost all classes of beta-lactam antibiotics. To date, no MBL inhibitors are available for clinical use. Of the three MBL subclasses, B2 enzymes, unlike those from subclasses B1 and B3, are fully active with one zinc ion bound and possess a narrow spectrum of activity, hydrolyzing carbapenem substrates almost exclusively. These remain the least studied MBLs. Sfh-I, originally identified from the aquatic bacterium Serratia fonticola UTAD54, is a divergent member of this group. Previous B2 MBL structures, available only for the CphA enzyme from Aeromonas hydrophila, all contain small molecules bound in their active sites. In consequence, the mechanism by which these enzymes activate the water nucleophile required for beta-lactam hydrolysis remains to be unambiguously established. Here we report crystal structures of Sfh-I as a complex with glycerol and in the unliganded form, revealing for the first time the disposition of water molecules in the B2 MBL active site. Our data indicate that the hydrolytic water molecule is activated by His118 rather than by Asp120 and/or zinc. Consistent with this proposal, we show that the environment of His118 in B2 MBLs is distinct from that of the B1 and B3 enzymes, where this residue acts as a zinc ligand, and offer a structure-based mechanism for p-lactam hydrolysis by these enzymes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据