4.7 Article

Structural Characterization of HBXIP: The Protein That Interacts with the Anti-Apoptotic Protein Survivin and the Oncogenic Viral Protein HBx

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 405, 期 2, 页码 331-340

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.046

关键词

HBXIP; HBx; survivin; centrosome division; hepatocarcinogenesis

资金

  1. ANR [ANR NT05-3_42614]
  2. ANRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis B X-interacting protein (HBXIP) is a ubiquitous protein that was originally identified as a binding partner of the hepatitis B viral protein HBx. HBXIP is also thought to serve as an anti-apoptotic cofactor of survivin, promoting the suppression of pro-caspase-9 activation. Here we report the crystal structure of the shortest isoform of HBXIP (91 aa long, similar to 11 kDa) at 1.5 angstrom resolution. HBXIP crystal shows a monomer per asymmetric unit, with a profilin-like fold which is common to a superfamily of proteins, the Roadblock/LC7 domain family involved in protein-protein interactions. Based on this fold, we propose that HBXIP can form a dimer that can indeed be found in the crystal when symmetric molecules are generated around the asymmetric unit. This dimer shows an extended beta-sheet area formed by 10 anti-parallel p.-strands from both subunits. Another interesting aspect of the proposed HBXIP dimer interface is the presence of a small leucine zipper between the two alpha 2 helices of each monomer. In solution, the scattering curve obtained by small-angle X-ray scattering for the sample used for crystallization indicates that the protein is predominantly in dimeric form in solution. The fit between the experimental small-angle X-ray scattering curve and the backcalculated curves for two potential crystal dimers shows a significant preference for the Roadblock/LC7 fold dimer model. Moreover, the HBXIP crystal structure represents a step towards understanding the cellular role of HBXIP. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据