4.7 Article

Spontaneous Proton Transfer to a Conserved Intein Residue Determines On-Pathway Protein Splicing

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 406, 期 3, 页码 430-442

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.12.024

关键词

FRET assay; reaction mechanism; quantum mechanics; protein splicing; intein mutagenesis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM44844, GM067545]
  2. National Science Foundation-Nanoscale Interdisciplinary Research Team [CTS-0304055]
  3. New York State Interconnect Focus Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of inteins, which are protein-splicing elements, has stimulated interest for various applications in chemical biology, bioseparations, drug delivery, and sensor development. However, for inteins to effectively contribute to these applications, an increased mechanistic understanding of cleavage and splicing reactions is required. While the multistep chemical reaction that leads to splicing is often explored and utilized, it is not clear how the intein navigates through the reaction space. The sequence of reaction steps must progress in concert in order to yield efficient splicing while minimizing off-pathway cleavage reactions. In this study, we demonstrate that formation of a previously identified branched intermediate is the critical step for determining splicing over cleavage products. By combining experimental assays and quantum mechanical simulations, we identify the electrostatic interactions that are important to the dynamics of the reaction steps. We illustrate, via an animated simulation trajectory, a proton transfer from the first C-terminal extein residue to a conserved aspartate, which synchronizes the multistep enzymatic reaction that is key to splicing. This work provides new insights into the complex interplay between critical active-site residues in the protein splicing mechanism, thereby facilitating biotechnological application while shedding light on multistep enzyme activity. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据