4.7 Article

Specific Structural Features of the N-Acetylmuramoyl-L-Alanine Amidase AmiD from Escherichia coli and Mechanistic Implications for Enzymes of This Family

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 397, 期 1, 页码 249-259

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.038

关键词

peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP); amidase activity; peptidoglycan metabolism; metallo-enzyme; lipoprotein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AmiD is the fifth identified N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine zinc amidase of Escherichia colt. This periplasmic lipoprotein is anchored in the outer membrane and has a broad specificity AmiD is capable of cleaving the intact peptidoglycan (PG) as well as soluble fragments containing N-acetylmuramic acid regardless of the presence of an anhydro form or not, unlike the four other amidases, AmiA, AmiB, AmiC, and AmpD, which have some specificity. AmiD function is, however, not clearly established but it could be part of the enzymatic machinery involved in the PG turnover in E coli. We solved three structures of the E. colt zinc amidase AmiD devoid of its lipidic anchorage the holoenzyme, the apoenzyme in complex with the substrate anhydro-N-acetylmuramic-acid-L-Ala-gamma-D-Glu-L-Lys, and the holoenzyme in complex with the L-Ala-gamma-D-Glu-L-Lys peptide, the product of the hydrolysis of this substrate by AmiD. The AmiD structure shows a relatively flexible N-terminal extension that allows an easy reach of the PG by the enzyme inserted into the outer membrane. The C-terminal domain provides a potential extended geometrical complementarity to the substrate. AmiD shares a common fold with AmpD, the bacteriophage T7 lysozyme, and the PG recognition proteins, which are receptor proteins involved in the innate immune responses of a wide range of organisms. Analysis of the different structures reveals the similarity between the catalytic mechanism of zinc amidases of the AmiD family and the thermolysm-related zinc peptidases (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据