4.7 Article

Structural Basis of Human CYP51 Inhibition by Antifungal Azoles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 397, 期 4, 页码 1067-1078

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.075

关键词

sterol 14alpha-demethylase; human cytochrome P450; antifungal drugs; X-ray crystallography

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [1097737]
  2. Genome Canada
  3. Ontario Genomics Institute
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  7. Ontario Innovation Trust
  8. Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation, Merck and Co., Inc.
  9. Novartis Research Foundation
  10. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The obligatory step in sterol biosynthesis in eukaryotes is demethylation of sterol precursors at the C14-position, which is catalyzed by CYP51 (sterol 14-alpha demethylase) in three sequential reactions. In mammals, the final product of the pathway is cholesterol, while important intermediates, meiosis-activating sterols, are produced by CYP51. Three crystal structures of human CYP51, ligand-free and complexed with antifiingal drugs ketoconazole and econazole, were determined, allowing analysis of the molecular basis for functional conservation within the CYP51 family. Azole binding occurs mostly through hydrophobic interactions with conservative residues of the active site. The substantial conformational changes in the B' helix and F G loop regions are induced upon ligand binding, consistent with the membrane nature of the protein and its substrate. The access channel is typical for mammalian sterol-metabolizing P450 enzymes, but is different from that observed in Mycobacterium tuberculosis CYP51. Comparison of the azole-bound structures provides insight into the relative binding affinities of human and bacterial P450 enzymes to ketoconazole and fluconazole, which can be useful for the rational design of antifungal compounds and specific modulators of human CYP51. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据