4.7 Article

A study in molecular contingency: Glutamine phosphoribosylpyrophosphate amidotransferase is a promiscuous and evolvable phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 377, 期 2, 页码 323-336

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.043

关键词

catalytic promiscuity; contingency; directed evolution; enzyme evolution; multicopy suppressor

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM074264, R01 GM074264-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of paralogous enzymes implies that novel catalytic functions can evolve on preexisting protein scaffolds. The weak secondary activities of proteins, which reflect catalytic promiscuity and substrate ambiguity, are plausible starting points for this evolutionary process. In this study, we observed the emergence of a new enzyme from the ASKA (A Complete Set of E. coli K-12 ORF Archive) collection of Escherichia coli open reading frames. The overexpression of (His)(6)-tagged glutamine phosphoribosylpyrophosphate amiclotransferase (PurF) unexpectedly rescued a A trpF E. coli strain from starvation on minimal media. The wild-type PurF and TrpF enzymes are unrelated in sequence, tertiary structure and catalytic mechanism. The promiscuous phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase activity of the ASKA PurF variant apparently stems from a preexisting affinity for phosphoribosylated substrates. The relative fitness of the (HiS)(6)-PurF/ Delta trpF strain was improved 4.8-fold to nearly wild-type levels by random mutagenesis of purF and genetic selection. The evolved and ancestral PurF proteins were purified and reacted with phosphoribosylanthranilate in vitro. The best evolvant (k(cat)/K-M=0.3 s(-1) M-1) was similar to 25-fold more efficient than its ancestor but > 10(7) -fold less efficient than the wild-type phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase. These observations demonstrate in quantitative terms that the weak secondary activities of promiscuous enzymes can dramatically improve the fitness of contemporary organisms. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据