4.7 Article

Structure of the tandem fibronectin type 3 domains of neural cell adhesion molecule

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 377, 期 2, 页码 524-534

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.030

关键词

cell adhesion; domain linker; crystal packing; protein interaction; X-ray crystallography

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524840/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. BBSRC [BB/D524840/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524840/1, BBD5248401] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [054334] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) by neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) is essential for NCAM-mediated neurite outgrowth. Previous peptide studies have identified two regions in the fibronectin type 3 (FN3)-like domains of NCAM as being important for these activities. Here we report the crystal structure of the NCAM FN3 domain tandem, which reveals an acutely bent domain arrangement. Mutation of a non-conserved surface residue (M610R) led to a second crystal form showing a substantially different conformation. Thus, the FN3 domain linker is highly flexible, suggesting that it corresponds to the hinge seen in electron micrographs of NCAM. The two putative FGFR1-binding segments, one in each NCAM FN3 domain, are situated close to the domain interface. They form a contiguous patch in the more severely bent conformation but become separated upon straightening of the FN3 tandem, suggesting that conformational changes within NCAM may modulate FGFR1 activation. Surface plasmon resonance experiments demonstrated only a very weak interaction between the NCAM FN3 tandem and soluble FGFR1 proteins expressed in mammalian cells (dissociation constant > 100 mu M). Thus, the NCAM-FGFR1 interaction at the cell surface is likely to depend upon avidity effects due to receptor clustering. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据