4.7 Article

Transcriptional Activation of Human Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Expression by Multiple Co-activators

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 383, 期 5, 页码 945-956

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.071

关键词

CARM1; p300; GRIP1; MMP-9; transcription

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA-97247, NS-54158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), a proteolytic enzyme for matrix proteins, chemokines and cytokines, is a major target in cancer and autoimmune diseases, since it is aberrantly upregulated. To control MMP-9 expression in pathological conditions, it is necessary to understand the regulatory mechanisms of MMP-9 expression. MMP-9 gene expression is regulated primarily at the transcriptional level. In this Study, we investigated the role of multiple co-activators in regulating MMP-9 transcription. We demonstrate that multiple transcriptional co-activators are involved in MMP-9 promoter activation, including CBP/p300, PCAF, CARM1. and GRIP1. Furthermore, enhancement of MMP-9 promoter activity requires the histone acetyltransferase activity of PCAF but not that of CBP/p300, and the methyltransferase activity of CARM1. More importantly, these co-activators are able to activate MMP-9 promoter activity independently, and function in a synergistic manner. Significant synergy was observed among CARM1, p300 and GRIP1, which is dependent on the interaction of p300 and CARM1 with the AD1 and AD2 domains of GRIP1, respectively. This suggests the formation of a ternary co-activator complex on the MMP-9 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that these co-activators associate with the endogenous MMP-9 promoter, and that siRNA knockdown of expression of these co-activators reduces endogenous MMP-9 expression. Taken together, these studies demonstrate a new level of transcriptional regulation of MMP-9 expression by the cooperative action of co-activators. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据