4.5 Review

New concepts of endoplasmic reticulum function in the heart: Programmed to conserve

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.10.006

关键词

Sarcoplasmic reticulum; Endoplasmic reticulum; Protein synthesis; Folding; Quality control; ER stress response

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-075573, HL-085577, HL104535]
  2. SDSU Heart Institute
  3. Rees-Stealy Research Foundation
  4. San Diego Chapter of the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists (ARCS) Foundation
  5. American Heart Association [10PRE3410005]
  6. Inamori Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted and membrane proteins play critical roles in myocardial health and disease. Studies in non-myocytes have shown that the pen-nuclear ER is the site for synthesis, folding, and quality control of most secreted and membrane proteins, as well as a nexus of a signal transduction system, called the ER stress response, which informs the cell about the status of ER protein folding. Moreover, the dynamic physical and functional association of the ER with mitochondria is a key site responsible for integrating ER function and mitochondrial metabolism, but is only just beginning to be understood in the myocardium. Although a great deal is known about roles played by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in contractile calcium handling in the heart, little is known about the relative locations and functions of the pen-nuclear ER and the SR in terms of secreted and membrane protein synthesis and folding. In this review we will explore the current state of knowledge of the location of secreted and membrane protein synthesis, folding, and quality control machinery in cardiac myocytes, as well as our understanding of the functional consequences of ER stress and the unfolded protein response in the heart in terms of protein synthesis, cell growth, and metabolic regulation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Focus on Cardiac Metabolism. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据