4.5 Article

Epinephrine-induced Ca2+ influx in vascular endothelial cells is mediated by CNGA2 channels

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.06.005

关键词

CNGA2 channels; epinephrine; isoprenaline; endothelial cells; Ca2+

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [Hong Kong Research Grant Council]
  2. Focused Investment Scheme of Chinese University of Hong Kong
  3. Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epinephrine, through its action on beta-adrenoceptors, may induce endothelium-dependent vascular dilation, and this action is partly mediated by a cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+](i)) change in endothelial cells. In the present study, we explored the molecular identity of the channels that mediate epinephrine-induced endothelial Ca2+ influx and subsequent vascular relaxation. Patch clamp recorded an epinephrine- and cAMP-activated cation current in the primary cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) and H5V endothelial cells. L-cis-diltiazem and LY-83583, two selective inhibitors for cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, diminished this cation current. Furthermore, this cation current was greatly reduced by a CNGA2-specific siRNA in H5V cells. With the use of fluorescent Ca2+ dye, it was found that epinephrine and isoprenaline, a beta-adrenoceptor agonist, induced endothelial Ca2+ influx in the presence of bradykinin. This Ca2+ influx was inhibited by L-cis-diltiazem and LY-83583, and by a beta(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI-118551. CNGA2-specific siRNA also diminished this Ca2+ influx in H5V cells. Furthermore, L-cis-diltiazem and LY-83583 inhibited the endothelial Ca2+ influx in isolated mouse aortic strips. L-cis-diltiazem also markedly reduced the endothelium-dependent vascular dilation to isoprenaline in isolated mouse aortic segments. In summary, CNG channels, CNGA2 in particular, mediate beta-adrenoceptor agonist-induced endothelial Ca2+ influx and subsequent vascular dilation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据