4.0 Article

Clinical findings in 10 children with H275Y influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection

期刊

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 888-892

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ped.12658

关键词

antiviral resistance; clinical effectiveness; H275Y substitution; influenza A(H1N1)pdm09; neuraminidase inhibitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLittle is known about the clinical effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors against H275Y influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. A cluster of H275Y influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus with cross-resistance to oseltamivir and peramivir was detected among untreated community patients in Hokkaido, Japan, during the 2013-2014 influenza season. MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study. Specimens from nasopharyngeal swabs underwent rapid testing and single-nucleotide polymorphism identification on real-time polymerase chain reaction. We collected clinical data from the H275Y group and a 275H wild-type comparison group. All children were given one of four neuraminidase inhibitors. ResultsTwenty-eight children infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus were analyzed. Ten viruses had the H275Y substitution, while the other 18 had wild-type 275H. Mean fever duration after treatment and after onset was 25.3h (95%CI: 14.1-36.5) and 48.9h (95%CI: 34.4-63.3) in the H275Y group, respectively, and 26.1h (95%CI: 18.7-33.6) and 46.3h (95%CI: 35.7-56.8) in the 275H group, respectively. In the H275Y group, three patients were treated with oseltamivir, one with peramivir, five with zanamivir, and one with laninamivir. All of them had mild symptoms and received only outpatient care. Fever duration was 7.5-21.0h and 18.0-66.0h after treatment and after onset, respectively, in the patients treated with oseltamivir and peramivir, and 20.5-42.0h and 42.0-88.0h, respectively, in those treated with zanamivir and laninamivir. ConclusionFever in the H275Y children treated with oseltamivir and peramivir resolved rapidly during the 2013-2014 influenza season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据