4.4 Article

Microfabrication and characterization of an array of dielectric elastomer actuators generating uniaxial strain to stretch individual cells

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/22/4/045020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-130453]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_130453] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells regulate their behavior in response to mechanical strains. Cell cultures to study mechanotransuction are typically cm(2) in area, far too large to monitor single cell response. We have developed an array of dielectric elastomer microactuators as a tool to study mechanotransduction of individual cells. The array consists of 72 100 mu m x 200 mu m electroactive polymer actuators which expand uniaxially when a voltage is applied. Single cells will be attached on each actuator to study their response to periodic mechanical strains. The device is fabricated by patterning compliant microelectrodes on both sides of a 30 mu m thick polydimethylsiloxane membrane, which is bonded to a Pyrex chip with 200 mu m wide trenches. Low-energy metal ion implantation is used to make stretchable electrodes and we demonstrate here the successful miniaturization of such ion-implanted electrodes. The top electrode covers the full membrane area, while the bottom electrodes are 100 mu m wide parallel lines, perpendicular to the trenches. Applying a voltage between the top and bottom electrodes leads to uniaxial expansion of the membrane at the intersection of the bottom electrodes and the trenches. To characterize the in-plane strain, an array of 4 mu m diameter aluminum dots is deposited on each actuator. The position of each dot is tracked, allowing displacement and strain profiles to be measured as a function of voltage. The uniaxial strain reaches 4.7% at 2.9 kV with a 0.2 s response time, sufficient to stimulate most cells with relevant biological strains and frequencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据