4.4 Article

Photopolymers with tunable mechanical properties processed by laser-based high-resolution stereolithography

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/18/12/125014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P19387]
  2. Austrian Research Promotion Agency [811442]
  3. European commission
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P19387] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stereolithography (SLA) is a widely used technique for the fabrication of prototypes and small series products. The main advantage of SLA and related solid freeform fabrication (SFF) techniques is their capability to fabricate parts with complex shapes with high resolution. Although the spectrum of available materials has been widened in recent years, there is still a lack of materials which can be processed with SLA on a routine basis. In this work, a micro-SLA (mu SLA) system is presented which can shape a number of different photopolymers with resolutions down to 5 mu m in the xy-plane and 10 mu m in the z-direction. The system is capable of processing various specifically tailored photopolymers which are based on acrylate chemistry. The materials processed for this work range from hybrid sol-gel materials ( ORMOCER) to photo-crosslinked elastomers and hydrogels. The elastic moduli of these materials can be tuned over several orders of magnitude and range from 0.1 MPa to 8000 MPa. The reactivity of these monomers is sufficient for achieving writing speeds up to 500 mm s(-1) which is comparable to commercial SLA resins. Various test structures are presented which show the suitability of the process for fabricating parts required for applications in micro-mechanical systems as well as for applications in biomedical engineering. Using the presented system, internal channels with a diameter of 50 mu m and a length of 1500 mu m could be fabricated. It was also possible to manufacture a micro-mechanical system consisting of a fixed axe and a free spinning turbine wheel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据