4.5 Article

Bulk-Like Laminated Nitride Metal/Semiconductor Superlattices for Thermoelectric Devices

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 672-680

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2282743

关键词

Laminates; superlattices; thermionic energy conversion; thermoelectric devices

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-09-0513]
  2. DARPA/Army Research Office [W911NF0810347]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bulk-like thermionic energy conversion devices have been fabricated from nanostructured nitride metal/semiconductor superlattices using a novel lamination process. 5-mu m thick (Hf0.5Zr0.5)N (6-nm)/ScN (6-nm) metal/semiconductor superlattices with a 12 nm period were deposited on 100-silicon substrates by reactive magnetron sputtering followed by a selective tetra methyl ammonium hydroxide substrate etching and a gold-gold lamination process to yield 300 mu m x 300 mu m x 290 mu m microscale thermionic energy conversion elements with 16,640 superlattice periods. The thermionic element had a Seebeck coefficient of -120 mu V/K at 800 K, an electrical conductivity of similar to 2500 Omega(-1)m(-1) at 800 K, and a thermal conductivity of 2.9 and 4.3 W/m-K at 300 and 625 K, respectively. The temperature dependence of the Seebeck coefficient from 300 to 800 K suggests a parallel parasitic conduction path that is dominant at low temperature, and the temperature independent electrical conductivity indicates that the (Hf0.5Zr0.5)N/gold interface contact resistivity currently dominates the device. The thermal conductivity of the laminate was significantly lower than the thermal conductivity of the individual metal or semiconductor layers, indicating the beneficial effect of the metal/semiconductor interfaces toward lowering the thermal conductivity. The described lamination process effectively bridges the gap between the nanoscale requirements needed to enhance the thermoelectric figure of merit ZT and the microscale requirements of real-world devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据