4.5 Article

Laser-Induced High-Strain-Rate Superplastic 3-D Microforming of Metallic Thin Films

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 273-281

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2040947

关键词

Laser processing; microforming; nanoindentation; shock pressure; superplastic; ultrahigh strain rate forming

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0547636]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0928752] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microforming of metals has always been a challenge because of the limited formability of metals at the microscale. This paper investigates an innovative microforming technique: microscale laser dynamic forming (mu LDF), which induces 3-D superplastic forming in metallic thin films. This forming process proceeds in a sequence of laser irradiation and ionization of ablative coating, shockwave generation and propagation in metallic thin films, and conformation of metallic thin films to the shape of microscale molds. Because the deformation proceeds at ultrahigh strain rates, it is found that materials experience superplastic deformation at the microscale. In this paper, experiments are systematically carried out to understand the deformation characteristics of mu LDF. The topologies and dimensions of the deformed samples are characterized by scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometry. The thickness variations are characterized by slicing the cross section of the deformed material using the focused ion beam. The magnitude of deformation depth in mu LDF is determined primarily by three critical factors: film thickness, mold geometry, and laser intensity. The relationships between these factors are explored in process maps to find suitable processing conditions for mu LDF. Nanoindentation tests are conducted to show that the strength of the thin films is increased significantly after mu LDF. [2009-0256]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据